The “New Urbanism” New, or Same old Collectivist Claptrap?
Broke the Guest Column barrier in the Wisconsin State Journal on 6/24/08 with a Guest Editorial I submitted on May 31 under the title above. To save space the Editor, Scott Milfred cut it to “Same old Collectivist Claptrap” which was fair minded. Since this format is new to me I will include it here as I am not sure the “link” will function:
County Executive Falk, County Supervisor Chair McDonell and the “progressive’ majority on the Board advocate the “New Urbanism” of high density housing controlled not locally, but by the County.
“Suburbs are chaotic and depressing agglomeration of buildings covering enormous stretches of land”
Mixed use developments (as opposed to single family houses) “allow easy access to public functions and services – day care, restaurants, parks… transportation”
“High rise housing is more equitable, promotes a sense of community and should be the primary unit” of housing.
“High density housing will allow easy access to public transportation” which is better than private transport which has “produced an overwhelming set of unresolved problems” and the “economic advantages of public transit for getting commuters to and from work areas are obvious and an answer to congestion in the central city”
Do these “New Urbanism-like” statements sound familiar?
Nothing new here, they are from the book, The Ideal Communist City written by the planners at the University of Moscow in 1965. See Randal O’Toole’s book, The Best Laid Plans, 2007, p.171
The USSR went on to build these ‘filing cabinet” apartments at a density of 70,000 people per square mile in Moscow (higher than Manhattan). These apartments and similar ones in the former Communist East Germany have now mostly been vacated, abandoned and torn down, much like the ill advised “Urban Renewal” “planned community” federally funded high rise apartments built in the 50’s-70’s in Chicago, and St Louis that became so crime ridden, residency fell to 35% before they were finally demolished – again using federal grants to do so.
The point: Top down planning by the Central Committee, the Politburo, the Capitol Area Regional Planning Commission, our county board does not work. It worked in a totalitarian, brutally controlled socialist society only as long as the inhabitants had no freedom of choice.
The county leaders appalling lack of trust in our free market system that has created the greatest and richest country in the world and their disdain for local control of zoning shows they dismiss the judgment and intelligence of their own neighbors, citizens, farmers, businessmen, developers, village and town councils in Dane County.

